Comparison of a Monoclonal Antibody-Blocking Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay and a Strip Immunoblot Assay for Identifying Type-Specific Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Serological Responses
Open Access
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
- Vol. 7 (4), 641-644
- https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.7.4.641-644.2000
Abstract
Detection of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2)-specific antibodies by a monoclonal antibody (MAb)-blocking enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) was compared with detection by a strip immunoblot assay (SIA) in a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic population. The study population consisted of 1,683 genitourinary medicine clinic attendees (582 women and 1,101 men). Sera were tested for the presence of HSV-2 antibody by use of the blocking EIA, in which binding of the MAb AP-1 to HSV-2 glycoprotein G-2 (gG-2) is blocked by HSV-2-specific antibody. The Chiron RIBA HSV-1 and -2 strip immunoassay (SIA) utilizes HSV-1- and HSV-2-specific or cross-reactive antigens immobilized on nitrocellulose strips (HSV gB-1 and HSV gG-1 peptide bands specific for HSV-1 antibody, HSV-2 gG-2 band specific for HSV-2 antibody, and HSV gD-2 band cross-reactive for HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies). A total of 1,612 sera were tested by MAb-blocking EIA for HSV-2 antibody and by SIA for HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies. By EIA, 541 (33.6%) sera were positive for HSV-2 antibody and 1,068 sera were negative for HSV-2 antibody; 3 sera gave equivocal results. HSV-2 antibody was detected in 555 (34.4%) sera by SIA; 144 (26%) of these sera possessed only HSV-2 antibody, and 411 (74%) sera contained both HSV-1 and HSV-2 antibodies. SIA detected HSV-1 antibody in 1,155 (71.6%) sera; 744 (64%) of these sera contained HSV-1 antibody alone. Sixteen sera contained antibody against HSV but could not be typed by SIA. A total of 512 sera were positive for HSV-2 antibody by both the EIA and SIA. We concluded that the blocking EIA and SIA showed a high level of agreement in detecting HSV-2 antibody in this population. In contrast to the SIA, the blocking EIA is a useful tool for large epidemiological studies, though the SIA proved to be slightly more sensitive once sera with discrepant results were further tested.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Raising the Consciousness for Identifying and Controlling Viral STDsSexually Transmitted Diseases, 1998
- Seroprevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 and Cytomegalovirus in AdolescentsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Relationship between Antibodies to Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) and Symptoms of HSV InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1996
- Monoclonal antibody blocking tests for the detection of HSV-1-and HSV-2-specific humoral responses: comparison with Western blot assayJournal of Virological Methods, 1995
- Virologic Characteristics of Subclinical and Symptomatic Genital Herpes InfectionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Antibody to herpes simplex virus type 2 as serological marker of sexual lifestyle in populationsBMJ, 1994
- Underestimation of HSV-2 Seroprevalence in a High-risk Population by Microneutralization AssaySexually Transmitted Diseases, 1993
- Laboratory techniques in the diagnosis of herpes simplex infection.Sexually Transmitted Infections, 1993
- Inability of Enzyme Immunoassays to Discriminate between Infections with Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2Annals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Use of densitometric analysis for interpreting HSV serologies based on Western blotJournal of Virological Methods, 1987