Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Research Policy
- Vol. 32 (4), 639-658
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00034-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Weak Property Rights and Holdup in R&DJournal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2000
- American universities as endogenous institutionsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2000
- New Technology-Based Firms In Sweden - A Study Of Their Direct Impact On Industrial RenewalEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 1999
- Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug DiscoveryJournal of Industrial Economics, 1998
- Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998
- Entrepreneurial spin‐off enterprises in Göteborg, SwedenEuropean Planning Studies, 1997
- Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored ResearchVirginia Law Review, 1996
- The evolution of corporate entrepreneurship in Swedish industry?was Schumpeter wrong?Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1995
- External technology acquisition in large multi‐technology corporationsR&D Management, 1992
- What is a Citation Worth?The Journal of Human Resources, 1986