COMPARISON OF HELICAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY AND PLAIN RADIOGRAPHY FOR ESTIMATING URINARY STONE SIZE
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 168 (6), 1235-1238
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200203000-00007
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE VALUE OF UNENHANCED HELICAL COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE FLANK PAINJournal of Urology, 1998
- Accuracy of detection and measurement of renal calculi: in vitro comparison of three-dimensional spiral CT, radiography, and nephrotomography.Radiology, 1997
- Spiral Computerized Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Flank Pain: A Replacement for Excretory UrographyJournal of Urology, 1997
- Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Diagnosis and treatment of nephrolithiasis: current perspectives.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1994
- Renal ColicArchives of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: The Methodist Hospital of Indiana ExperienceJournal of Urology, 1986
- Utility of the plain abdominal radiograph for diagnosing ureteral calculiAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1985
- ROENTGENOGRAPHY OF URINARY TRACT DURING EXCRETION OF SODIUM IODIDPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1923