Physical and Biological Characterization of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide- and Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Labeled Cells
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Investigative Radiology
- Vol. 40 (8), 504-513
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000162925.26703.3a
Abstract
Superparamagnetic iron-oxide particles are used frequently for cellular magnetic resonance imaging and in vivo cell tracking. The purpose of this study was to compare the labeling characteristics and efficiency as well as toxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) and ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) for 3 cell lines. Using human fibroblasts, immortalized rat progenitor cells and HEP-G2-hepatoma cells, dose- and time-dependence of SPIO and USPIO uptake were evaluated. The amount of intracellular (U)SPIO was monitored over 2 weeks after incubation by T2-magnetic resonance relaxometry, ICP-mass-spectrometry, and histology. Transmission-electronmicroscopy was used to specify the intracellular localization of the endocytosed iron particles. Cell death-rate and proliferation-index were assessed as indicators of cell-toxicity. For all cell lines, SPIO showed better uptake than USPIO, which was highest in HEP-G2 cells (110 +/- 2 pg Fe/cell). Cellular iron concentrations in progenitor cells and fibroblasts were 13 +/- 1pg Fe/cell and 7.2 +/- 0.3pg Fe/cell, respectively. For all cell lines T2-relaxation times in cell pellets were below detection threshold (<3 milliseconds) after 5 hours of incubation with SPIO (3.0 micromol Fe/mL growth medium) and continued to be near the detection for the next 6 days. For both particle types and all cell lines cellular iron oxide contents decreased after recultivation and surprisingly were found lower than in unlabeled control cells after 15 days. Viability and proliferation of (U)SPIO-labeled and unlabeled cells were not significantly different. The hematopoetic progenitor, mesenchymal fibroblast and epithelial HEP-G2 cell lines accumulated SPIO more efficiently than USPIO indicating SPIO to be better suited for cell labeling. However, the results indicate that there may be an induction of forced cellular iron elimination after incubation with (U)SPIO.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Non-Invasive Approach to Detecting Organ Rejection by MRI: Monitoring the Accumulation of Immune Cells At the Transplanted OrganCurrent Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 2004
- Imaging the fate of implanted bone marrow stromal cells labeled with superparamagnetic nanoparticlesMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003
- Molecular magnetic resonance imaging with targeted contrast agentsJournal of Cellular Biochemistry, 2003
- Focal Hepatic Lesions: Detection and Characterization with Combination Gadolinium- and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide–enhanced MR ImagingRadiology, 2003
- Differential Conjugation of Tat Peptide to Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles and Its Effect on Cellular UptakeBioconjugate Chemistry, 2002
- Macrocyclic Chelators with Paramagnetic Cations Are Internalized into Mammalian Cells via a HIV-Tat Derived Membrane Translocation PeptideBioconjugate Chemistry, 2000
- Tat peptide-derivatized magnetic nanoparticles allow in vivo tracking and recovery of progenitor cellsNature Biotechnology, 2000
- High-Efficiency Intracellular Magnetic Labeling with Novel Superparamagnetic-Tat Peptide ConjugatesBioconjugate Chemistry, 1999
- Magnetically labeled cells can be detected by MR imagingJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 1997
- Physical and chemical properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide MR contrast agents: Ferumoxides, ferumoxtran, ferumoxsilMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 1995