A Comparison of Six Weeks with Six Months of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy after a First Episode of Venous Thromboembolism
Open Access
- 22 June 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 332 (25), 1661-1665
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199506223322501
Abstract
The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of venous thromboembolism is still a matter of debate.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of oral anticoagulant control and treatment in SwedenJournal of Internal Medicine, 1994
- Optimum duration of anticoagulation for deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolismThe Lancet, 1992
- A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT StudyArchives of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Anticoagulants in venous thromboembolism.BMJ, 1988
- Haemorrhagic and Thromboembolic Complications versus Intensity of Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism with Oral AnticoagulantsActa Medica Scandinavica, 1988
- One‐Month versus Six‐Month Therapy with Oral Anticoagulants after Symptomatic Deep Vein ThrombosisActa Medica Scandinavica, 1985
- The Duration of Oral Anticoagulation after Deep Vein ThrombosisActa Medica Scandinavica, 1985
- Adjusted Subcutaneous Heparin versus Warfarin Sodium in the Long-Term Treatment of Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Warfarin Sodium versus Low-Dose Heparin in the Long-Term Treatment of Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Assessment of Anticoagulant Treatment of Venous ThromboembolismAnnals of Surgery, 1969