Comparison Between Cytobrush® and Papaplast® in Sampling Vaginal Smears
- 7 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 70 (7-8), 595-599
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349109007923
Abstract
The ability of Cytobrush® and Papaplast® to collect endocervical cells in vaginal smears was tested in a prospective randomized comparative study including 107 women. Endocervical cells were found more often and in greater numbers with Cytobrush, also in women over 50 years of age. Papaplast missed endocervical cells twice as often as did Cytobrush. The use of the latter instrument meant that the number of repeat smears necessitated due to the absence of endocervical cells could be considerably reduced, with consequent improvement in the cost/benefit ratio.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- An explanation for the problem of false‐negative cervical smearsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- Nylon brush improves collection of cervical cytologic specimensAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- False-Negative Cytology in Invasive Cancer of the CervixClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1983
- Studies on the distribution of abnormal cells in cytologic preparationsGynecologic Oncology, 1983
- Negative Smears in Women Developing Invasive Cervical CancerActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1977
- Endocervical cells in cervical smearsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1972
- THE BIOLOGICAL STATUS OF CARCINOMA IN‐SITU OF THE UTERINE CERVIXBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1966
- EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF TWO FORMS OF CERVICAL CARCINOMABJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1966