DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS: COMPARISON OF CLINICAL EVALUATION, ULTRASOUND, PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, AND VENOSCAN WITH X-RAY VENOGRAM
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 324 (8405), 716-719
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92625-4
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contrast agent induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: iopamidol versus meglumine iothalamateThe British Journal of Radiology, 1984
- Thromboscintigraphy with 99Tcm-plasminNuclear Medicine Communications, 1984
- Deep vein thrombosis detection by 99mTc-plasmin test and phlebographyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1984
- The Role of Two Noninvasive Tests in Deep Venous ThrombosisAnnals of Surgery, 1981
- Cost Effectiveness of Clinical Diagnosis, Venography, and Noninvasive Testing in Patients with Symptomatic Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Technetium 99m-plasmin: a new test for the detection of deep vein thrombosisThe British Journal of Radiology, 1980
- PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THROMBOPHLEBITIS AND "PSEUDOTHROMBOPHLEBITIS"The Lancet, 1980
- VASCULAR-LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF CLINICALLY SUSPECTED ACUTE DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSISThe Lancet, 1978
- VenographyCirculation, 1973
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HAEMORRHAGE DURING THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH THE COUMARIN ANTICOAGULANTSActa Medica Scandinavica, 1958