Re: Population Stratification in Epidemiologic Studies of Common Genetic Variants and Cancer: Quantification of Bias
Open Access
- 17 January 2001
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 93 (2), 156-157
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.2.156
Abstract
Epidemiologists have long suspected that, in populations with racial or ethnic subgroups, spurious associations may arise between genetic markers and disease (1). Incomplete mixing of subgroups, known as population stratification or admixture, can lead to bias if one more or subgroups carries both a higher prevalence of an allele and a higher risk of disease (2). The magnitude and direction of the resulting bias are not well understood. Recently, a variety of alternative study designs have been proposed to avoid the problem of population stratification, including case–parent and case–sibling methods (2).Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Choosing a Retrospective Design to Assess Joint Genetic and Environmental Contributions to RiskAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Population Stratification in Epidemiologic Studies of Common Genetic Variants and Cancer: Quantification of BiasJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Interface of genetics and epidemiology.Epidemiologic Reviews, 2000
- P57 (KIP2) polymorphisms and breast cancer riskHuman Genetics, 1999
- Catechol-O-methyltransferase and breast cancer riskCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1998