Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training
Open Access
- 1 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Psychological Research
- Vol. 85 (4), 1473-1487
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01335-y
Abstract
Content variability was previously suggested to promote stronger learning effects in cognitive training whereas less variability incurred transfer costs (Sabah et al. Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7,2018). Here, we expanded these findings by additionally examining the role of learners' control in short-term task-switching training by comparing voluntary task-switching to a yoked control forced task-switching condition. To this end, four training conditions were compared: (1) forced fixed content, (2) voluntary fixed content, (3) forced varied content, and (3) voluntary varied content. To further enhance task demands, bivalent stimuli were used during training. Participants completed baseline assessment commencing with task-switching and verbal fluency blocks, followed by seven training blocks and last by task-switching (near transfer) and verbal fluency (far transfer) blocks, respectively. For the baseline and transfer task-switching blocks, we used the exact same baseline and first transfer block from Sabah et al. (Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7,2018), employing univalent stimuli and alternating-runs task sequence. Our results pointed again to the contribution of content variability to task-switching performance. No indications for far transfer were observed. Allowing for learners' control was not found to produce additional transfer gains beyond content variability. A between-study comparison suggests that enhanced task demands, by means of bivalency, promoted higher transfer gains in the current study when compared to Sabah et al. (Psychological Research, 10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7,2018). Taken together, the current results provide further evidence to the beneficial impact of variability on training outcomes. The lack of modulatory effect for learners' control is discussed in relation to possible methodological limitations.Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DR 392/9-1)
This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adultsNature, 2013
- What Is the Subjective Cost of Cognitive Effort? Load, Trait, and Aging Effects Revealed by Economic PreferencePLOS ONE, 2013
- Learning Effects of Self-Controlled Practice Scheduling for Children and Adults: Are the Advantages Different?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2013
- Practice effects in the developing brain: A pilot studyDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2012
- The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms frameworkTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2012
- Self-Controlled Learning: The Importance of Protecting Perceptions of CompetenceFrontiers in Psychology, 2012
- DOOM'd to switch: superior cognitive flexibility in players of first person shooter gamesFrontiers in Psychology, 2010
- Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2010
- What Is Learned under Difficult Conditions Is Hard to Forget: Contextual Interference Effects in Foreign Vocabulary Acquisition, Retention, and TransferJournal of Memory and Language, 2002
- Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults.Neuropsychology, 1997