A Meta-Analysis on the Interaction between HER-2 Expression and Response to Endocrine Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer
Open Access
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 11 (13), 4741-4748
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-2569
Abstract
Purpose: Experimental data suggest a complex cross-talk between HER-2 and estrogen receptor, and it has been hypothesized that HER-2-positive tumors may be less responsive to certain endocrine treatments. Clinical data, however, have been conflicting. We have conducted a meta-analysis on the interaction between the response to endocrine treatment and the overexpression of HER-2 in metastatic breast cancer. Experimental Design: Studies have been identified by searching the Medline, Embase, and American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract databases. Selection criteria were (a) metastatic breast cancer, (b) endocrine therapy (any line of treatment), and (c) evaluation of HER-2 expression (any method). For each study, the relative risk for treatment failure for HER-2-positive over HER-2-negative patients with 95% confidence interval was calculated as an estimate of the predictive effect of HER-2. Pooled estimates of the relative risk were computed by the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results: Twelve studies (n = 2,379 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall relative risk was 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-1.52; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.380). For studies involving tamoxifen, the pooled relative risk was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.48; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.97); for studies involving other hormonal drugs, a pooled relative risk of 1.49 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.64; P < 0.00001; test for heterogeneity = 0.08) was estimated. A second meta-analysis limited to tumors that were either estrogen receptor positive, estrogen receptor unknown, or estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive yielded comparable results. Conclusions: HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer is less responsive to any type of endocrine treatment. This effect holds in the subgroup of patients with positive or unknown steroid receptors.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Serum HER-2/neu and Response to the Aromatase Inhibitor Letrozole Versus TamoxifenJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Individual Patient- versus Literature-Based Meta-analysis of Survival Data: Time to Event and Event Rate at a Particular Time Can Make a Difference, an Example Based on Head and Neck CancerControlled Clinical Trials, 2001
- The clinical relevance of static disease (no change) category for 6 months on endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancerEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- ErbB-2, the preferred heterodimerization partner of all ErbB receptors, is a mediator of lateral signalingThe EMBO Journal, 1997
- Tumor Marker Utility Grading System: a Framework to Evaluate Clinical Utility of Tumor MarkersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Prognostic significance of serum c-erbB-2 protein in breast cancer patientsBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1996
- Epidermal Growth Factor-related Peptides Activate Distinct Subsets of ErbB Receptors and Differ in Their Biological ActivitiesJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1996
- Oncogene amplification and prognosis in breast cancer: Relationship with systemic treatmentGene, 1995
- MCF-7 breast cancer cells overexpressing transfectedc-erbB-2 have anin vitro growth advantage in estrogen-depleted conditions and reduced estrogen-dependence and tamoxifen-sensitivityin vivoBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1995
- Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) as a marker for poor prognosis in node-negative breast cancer patients: Neu and tamoxifen failureThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1990