Outcome of intensive care patients in a group of British intensive care units
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 26 (8), 1337-1345
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199808000-00017
Abstract
To identify priorities for intensive care unit (ICU) intervention and research. Analysis of a large intensive care database. Twenty-four ICUs in the North Thames region of the United Kingdom. All patients admitted to an ICU between January 1, 1992, and April 31, 1996, on whom data had been entered into the database. Patients who were admitted after cardiac surgery, who had burns, or were None. A total of 23,331 admissions with complete records were available. After exclusions, 12,762 admissions from 15 ICUs were selected for analysis. Hospital mortality was 32.5% with a mortality ratio of 1.14 (95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.17). Nonsurvivors were older than survivors and had longer ICU stays. Patients admitted from wards had a higher mortality than patients from the operating room/recovery or the emergency department. Observed percentage mortality increased linearly with mortality predicted by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, although the number of patients who died remained broadly constant across the range of predicted mortality. Twenty-seven percent of all deaths occurred after discharge from the ICU. Patients admitted after cardiopulmonary resuscitation constituted 30% of all deaths. Thirty-four percent of patients were in the ICU for >2 days, and they accounted for nearly 81% of bed days. Early identification of patients at risk, both before admission and after discharge from the ICU, may allow treatment to decrease mortality. Research and resources may be best directed at patients who die, despite a relatively low predicted mortality. Although these patients are a small percentage of the low-risk admissions, they constitute a large number of ICU deaths. Many patients die after discharge from ICU and this mortality may be decreased by minimizing inappropriate early discharge to the ward, by the provision of high-dependency and step-down units, and by continuing advice and follow-up by the ICU team after the patient has been discharged. Intervention before ICU admission and support of patients after discharge from the ICU should be part of the effort to decrease mortality for ICU patients. Inadequate provision of resources for critically ill patients may result in excess intensive care mortality that is not detected with ICU outcome prediction methods. (Crit Care Med 1998; 26:1337-1345)Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mortality predicted by APACHE IIAnaesthesia, 1996
- The importance of technology for achieving superior outcomes from intensive careIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Potential Improvements to Emergency Medical Services for Victims of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Effectiveness of Emergency Medical Services for Victims of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A MetaanalysisAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- The effect of casemix adjustment on mortality as predicted by APACHE IIIntensive Care Medicine, 1996
- Providing intensive careBMJ, 1996
- Evaluation of predictive ability of APACHE II system and hospital outcome in Canadian intensive care unit patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Intensive Care Society's APACHE II study in Britain and Ireland--II: Outcome comparisons of intensive care units after adjustment for case mix by the American APACHE II method.BMJ, 1993
- An Evaluation of Outcome from Intensive Care in Major Medical CentersAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Inappropriate use of intensive care.BMJ, 1984