Blue calls--time for a change?
Open Access
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- pre hospital-care
- Published by BMJ in Emergency Medicine Journal
- Vol. 18 (4), 289-292
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.18.4.289
Abstract
Prior alert via a landline telephone (“blue call”) is commonly used to warn accident and emergency (A&E) departments of the impending arrival of a seriously ill or injured patient. There are no published indications for making such calls or validated protocols on message content. Submitted telephone information has the potential for distortion as it is passed through the control centre resulting in inappropriate resource allocation. This study focuses on the quality and content of the message in the context of the available patient details as well as reviewing the clinical indications for the call. Data were collected on patients for whom “blue calls” were made to an A&E department over three months of 1998. Patients with life threatening conditions who were brought by non-blue light ambulance were identified during the same period. Similar details were collected on these critical patients. Of the 189 “blue calls” with complete details, 73% were admitted, (12% to ITU) and 18% died. Sixty nine per cent of cases were medical, 26% trauma and 5% obstetric. Pre-hospital observations were missing for 25% of patients (excluding patients in cardiac arrest), suggesting that the decisions to make a pre-alert call may have been based on subjective criteria in a significant minority. Information given over the telephone invariably included age, sex and presenting complaint but details of the current condition of the patient were included in only 11%. On reviewing pre-hospital information, a consultant in A&E and an ambulance paramedic judged that a prior alert was justified in 93% but additional information would be helpful in 52% of cases to correctly mobilise resources. Seventy five “clinically critical” patients were found in the three months of the study. Clinically critical patients were patients who had no prior alert, transported by ambulance, who were subsequently admitted to intensive care, theatre, or other high dependency areas. They included 27 patients with symptoms of a myocardial infarction. These patients may have benefited from prior alert. A protocol is suggested to provide criteria for making a prior alert to the A&E department via a landline connection. A standardised message structure would be used using vital signs and mechanism of injury or type of illness to assist in hospital preparation.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Study of early warning of accident and emergency departments by ambulance services.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1999
- Rapid ambulance protocol for acute strokeThe Lancet, 1999
- Effects of emergency ambulance transportation on heart rate, blood pressure, corticotropin, and cortisol.Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Does the Manchester triage system detect the critically ill?Emergency Medicine Journal, 1999
- Effect of vital signs on advanced life support interventions for prehospital patients.Prehospital Emergency Care, 1997
- Prehospital classification combined with an in-hospital trauma radio system response reduces cost and duration of evaluation of the injured patientSurgery, 1995
- A prospective comparison of paramedic judgment and the trauma triage rule in the prehospital settingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- Scoring Systems and Triage from the FieldEmergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 1993
- Vital signs as part of the prehospital assessment of the pediatric patient: A survey of paramedicsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1990
- Clinical Judgment: How Expert Nurses Use IntuitionThe American Journal of Nursing, 1987