Work tolerance and subjective responses to wearing protective clothing and respirators during physical work
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ergonomics
- Vol. 32 (9), 1111-1123
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138908966878
Abstract
This study examined work tolerance and subjective responses while performing two levels of work and wearing four types of protective ensembles. Nine males (mean age = 24·8 years, weight = 75·3 kg, [Vdot]O2 max = 44·6 ml/kg min) each performed a series of eight experimental tests in random order, each lasting up to 180 min in duration. Work was performed on a motor-driven treadmill at a set walking speed and elevation which produced work intensities of either 30% or 60% of each subject's maximum aerobic capacity. Work/rest intervals were established based on anticipated SCBA refill requirements. Environmental temperature averaged 22·6°C and average relative humidity was 55%. The four protective ensembles were: a control ensemble consisting of light work clothing (CONTROL); light work clothing with an open circuit self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA); firefighter's turnout gear with SCBA (FF); and chemical protective clothing with SCBA (CHEM). Test duration (tolerance time) was determined by physiological responses reaching a predetermined indicator of high stress or by a 180-min limit. Physiological and subjective measurements obtained every 2·5 min included: heart rate, skin temperature, rectal temperature, and subjective ratings of perceived exertion, thermal sensation, and perspiration. The mean tolerance times were 155, 130, 26, and 73 min, respectively, for the CONTROL, SCBA, FF, and CHEM conditions during low intensity work; and 91, 23, 4, and 13 min, respectively, during high intensity work. Differences between ensemble and work intensity were significant FF and CHEM heart rate responses did not reach a steady state, and rose rapidly compared to CONTROL and SCBA values. SCBA heart rates remained approximately 15 beats higher than the CONTROL ensemble during the tests. At the low work intensity, mean skin.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physiological effects associated with the use of respiratory protective devices. A review.Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 1984
- Estimation of the Exertion Requirements of Coal Mining WorkChest, 1984
- Psychological Problems Associated with the Wearing of Industrial Respirators: A ReviewAihaj Journal, 1983
- The ANOVR Series: Analyses for Repeated Measure Designs with Optional Robust Procedures when Assumptions are ViolatedThe American Statistician, 1981
- Effect of heat stress on physiological factors for industrial workers performing routine work and wearing impermeable vapor-barrier clothingAihaj Journal, 1981
- 8: 45 a.m.: INTERACTION OF ANXIETY, PERCEIVED EXERTION, AND DYSPNEA IN THE PERSON-RESPIRATOR INTERFACEMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1981
- ANOVR: Analysis of variance with repeated measuresBehavior Research Methods, 1980
- Physiological Responses of Men Working in Fire Fighting Equipment in the HeatErgonomics, 1979
- Physiological Effects on Work Performance of Vapor-Barrier Clothing and Full-Face RespiratorJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1978
- Respiratory and Circulatory Response to Added Air Flow Resistance during ExerciseErgonomics, 1972