Stopping guidelines vs stopping rules: a practitioner's point of view
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods
- Vol. 13 (19), 2395-2417
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928408828833
Abstract
Monitoring interim accumulating data in a clinical trial for evidence of therapeutic benefit or toxicity is a frequent policy, usually carried out by an independent scientific committee. While statistical methodology has been developed to assess the significance of these interim analyses, such methods should not be viewed as absolute rules but only serve as useful guides. The decision process to terminate a trial early is very complex and many factors must be taken into account. The complexity of this decision process is illustrated by reviewing the experience of several recent clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- An overview of sequential methods and their application in clinical trialsCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 1984
- A Randomized Trial of Propranolol in Patients With Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 1982
- The β-Blocker Heart Attack TrialPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1981
- Practical aspects of decision making in clinical trials: The coronary drug project as a case studyControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Aspirin in Persons Recovered From Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 1980
- The Analysis of Data from Clinical TrialsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1979
- Clofibrate and Niacin in Coronary Heart DiseaseJAMA, 1975
- The Coronary Drug ProjectJAMA, 1973
- The Coronary Drug ProjectPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1972
- The Coronary Drug ProjectPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1970