Cost effectiveness and cost utility model of public place defibrillators in improving survival after prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest
Open Access
- 4 December 2003
- Vol. 327 (7427), 1316
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1316
Abstract
Objective To determine the cost effectiveness and cost utility of locating defibrillators in all major airports, railway stations, and bus stations throughout Scotland. Design Economic modelling exercise with data from Heartstart (Scotland). Parameters used in economic model included direct costs derived for increased accident and emergency attendances, increased hospital bed days, purchase and maintenance of defibrillators, and training in their use; life years gained calculated from increased discharges from hospital and mean survival after discharge; utility (quality of life) obtained from published data. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of model. Future gains discounted at 1.5% a year and future costs at 6%. Setting Whole of Scotland. Subjects Records of all prehospital cardiac arrests due to presumed heart disease that occurred in a major airport, railway, or bus station between May 1991 and March 1998 and were not witnessed by ambulance or medical staff. Main outcome measures Observed survival to hospital admission and observed survival to discharge. Predicted survival calculated by applying observed survival in patients attended by ambulance staff within three minutes to those who waited longer. Results The total discounted direct costs were £18 325 a year. The cost per life year gained was £29 625 ($49 625, €;43 151) and the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained was £41 146 ($68 924, €;59 932). More widespread provision of public place defibrillators would increase these figures. Conclusions The cost per QALY calculated for public place defibrillators represents poorer value for money than some alternative strategies for improving survival after prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest, such as the use of other trained first responders. The figure exceeds the commonly discussed cut off levels for funding in the United Kingdom and United States of £30 000 and $50 000 per QALY, respectively.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Potential impact of public access defibrillators on survival after out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: retrospective cohort studyBMJ, 2002
- Cost-effectiveness of Automated External Defibrillators on AirlinesJAMA, 2001
- Effect of reducing ambulance response times on deaths from out of hospital cardiac arrest: cohort studyBMJ, 2001
- For debate Public access defibrillation: a shocking idea?Journal of Public Health, 2001
- Cost effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) treatment related to the risk of coronary heart disease and cost of drug treatmentHeart, 1999
- Public-access defibrillation: where do we place the AEDs?Prehospital Emergency Care, 1999
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitationCritical Care Medicine, 1996
- Cost-effectiveness of Routine Coronary Angiography After Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1996
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Potential Improvements to Emergency Medical Services for Victims of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Utstein Style. A statement for health professionals from a task force of the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Australian Resuscitation Council.Circulation, 1991