Patient-Reported Aesthetic Satisfaction with Breast Reconstruction during the Long-Term Survivorship Perio
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 124 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181ab10b2
Abstract
Expander/implant and autogenous tissue breast reconstructions have different aging processes, and the time when these processes stabilize is unclear. The authors' goal was to evaluate long-term patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with expander/implant and autogenous breast reconstruction. The authors surveyed a cross-section of University of Michigan women who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction (response rate, 73 percent) between 1988 and 2006 [110 expander/implant and 109 transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) reconstructions]. Each group was stratified into three postreconstructive periods: short term (≤5 years), intermediate (6 to 8 years), and long term (>8 years). Validated satisfaction items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale; scores were dichotomized into positive and negative responses. Logistic regression assessed satisfaction by procedure, while controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Mean follow-up time after reconstruction was 6.5 years (range, 1 to 18 years). Procedure type had no effect on short-term aesthetic satisfaction. However, in the long term, reconstruction type considerably affected satisfaction. Although satisfaction with TRAM reconstruction remained relatively constant, satisfaction with expander/implants was significantly less among those patients in the long term. Patients who had undergone implant reconstruction more than 8 years earlier, compared with those who undergone implant reconstruction less than 5 years earlier, were significantly less satisfied with breast appearance (odds ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.48), softness (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.64), and size (odds ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.62). In the long term, TRAM patients, compared with expander/implant patients, appear to have significantly greater aesthetic satisfaction. These long-term data have important implications for women's health in the survivorship period and will help women navigate the complex decision-making process of breast reconstruction.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aesthetic Outcome of Different Techniques of Reconstruction following Nipple-Areola???Preserving Envelope Mastectomy with Immediate ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2007
- Patient Satisfaction and Aesthetic Results After Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle Flap for Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2006
- Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategiesAnz Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Satisfaction with Surgery Outcomes and the Decision Process in a Population‐Based Sample of Women with Breast CancerHealth Services Research, 2005
- Clinical Outcome and Patients?? Satisfaction After Simultaneous Bilateral Breast Reconstruction With Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Muscle (TRAM) FlapAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2004
- Comparison of Unipedicled and Bipedicled TRAM Flap Breast Reconstructions: Assessment of Physical Function and Patient SatisfactionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2004
- Patient Satisfaction With Delayed Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective StudyAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2002
- Patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction and reduction mammaplastyScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 2001
- Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Postmastectomy Breast ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2000
- Aesthetic Results and Patient Satisfaction with Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Tissue Expansion: A Follow-Up StudyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1997