EVALUATION OF 5 IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES IN ECHINOCOCCOSIS PATIENTS
- 1 January 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 59 (5), 767-772
Abstract
Double diffusion (DD), indirect hemagglutination (IHA), immunoelectrophoresis (IEP), latex agglutination(LA) and complement fixation (CF) tests were evaluated for sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of 141 surgically-proven Turkana echinococcosis patients and 10 controls. The overall sensitivities for the tests were as follows: IHA, 86.7%; LA, 53.3%; CF, 63.3%; DD, 55.0%; IEP, 55.0%. LA and CF tests produced a higher number of false positive results; IHA gave a false positive result in 10% of cases; no false positives were obtained with IEP and DD. A combination of the latter 3 tests would offer the best chance of detecting specific anti-Echinococcus antibodies, with an average sensitivity of 62.7%. The possible reasons for the relatively high incidence of false negative values are discussed.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human hydatidosis: evaluation of three serodiagnostic methods, the principal subclass of specific immunoglobulin and the detection of circulating immune complexesPathogens and Global Health, 1978
- General Remarks on Principles, Equipment, Reagents and ProceduresScandinavian Journal of Immunology, 1973