Protein kinase R reveals an evolutionary model for defeating viral mimicry
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 457 (7228), 485-489
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07529
Abstract
Poxviruses, such as small pox, undermine host defences by producing a protein called K3L, which closely mimics the substrate of protein kinase R (PKR), an important component of the vertebrate innate immunity system. Elde et al. show that PKR evolved under dramatic episodes of positive selection in primates, substituting amino acids at sites where K3L and PKR meet. The evolutionary changes increase the chances of the host defeating the mimic and see the two protagonists locked in a molecular 'arms race' trying to out-smart and out-evolve each other. This paper documents the evolutionary interaction between the innate immunity gene protein kinase R (PKR), its substrate elF2α, and its poxvirus mimic K3L. It is concluded that the rapid evolution of the PKR gene may be due to viral mimicry. Distinguishing self from non-self is a fundamental biological challenge. Many pathogens exploit the challenge of self discrimination by employing mimicry to subvert key cellular processes including the cell cycle, apoptosis and cytoskeletal dynamics1,2,3,4,5. Other mimics interfere with immunity6,7. Poxviruses encode K3L, a mimic of eIF2α, which is the substrate of protein kinase R (PKR), an important component of innate immunity in vertebrates8,9. The PKR–K3L interaction exemplifies the conundrum imposed by viral mimicry. To be effective, PKR must recognize a conserved substrate (eIF2α) while avoiding rapidly evolving substrate mimics such as K3L. Using the PKR–K3L system and a combination of phylogenetic and functional analyses, we uncover evolutionary strategies by which host proteins can overcome mimicry. We find that PKR has evolved under intense episodes of positive selection in primates. The ability of PKR to evade viral mimics is partly due to positive selection at sites most intimately involved in eIF2α recognition. We also find that adaptive changes on multiple surfaces of PKR produce combinations of substitutions that increase the odds of defeating mimicry. Thus, although it can seem that pathogens gain insurmountable advantages by mimicking cellular components, host factors such as PKR can compete in molecular ‘arms races’ with mimics because of evolutionary flexibility at protein interaction interfaces challenged by mimicry.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Positive Selection and Increased Antiviral Activity Associated with the PARP-Containing Isoform of Human Zinc-Finger Antiviral ProteinPLoS Genetics, 2008
- An Evolutionary-Network Model Reveals Stratified Interactions in the V3 Loop of the HIV-1 EnvelopePLoS Computational Biology, 2007
- On the origin of smallpox: Correlating variola phylogenics with historical smallpox recordsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Crystal Structure of an Ancient Protein: Evolution by Conformational EpistasisScience, 2007
- Mechanistic approaches to the study of evolution: the functional synthesisNature Reviews Genetics, 2007
- PAML 4: Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum LikelihoodMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2007
- Positive selection of yeast nonhomologous end-joining genes and a retrotransposon conflict hypothesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Shigella applies molecular mimicry to subvert vinculin and invade host cellsThe Journal of cell biology, 2006
- A Scan for Positively Selected Genes in the Genomes of Humans and ChimpanzeesPLoS Biology, 2005
- Ancient Adaptive Evolution of the Primate Antiviral DNA-Editing Enzyme APOBEC3GPLoS Biology, 2004