A comparison of the absorption from a ‘chemically defined elemental’ and a ‘whole protein’ enteral feed by the human small bowel
- 1 August 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 6 (3), 127-130
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5614(87)90045-8
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- SODIUM AND WATER DEPLETION IN ILEOSTOMY PATIENTSThe Lancet, 1986
- Energy and Mineral Utilization from a Peptide‐Based Elemental Diet and a Polymeric Enteral Diet Given to Ileostomists in the Early Postoperative CourseJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1984
- Comparison of an elemental and polymeric enteral diet in patients with normal gastrointestinal function.Gut, 1983
- Rational Use of Elemental and Nonelemental Diets in Hospitalized PatientsAnnals of Surgery, 1980
- Comparison of the absorption of two protein hydrolysates and their effects on water and electrolyte movements in the human jejunum.Gut, 1980
- Comparison of proprietary elemental and whole-protein diets in unconscious patients with head injury.BMJ, 1980
- Decreased trypsin and bile acids in ileal fistula drainage during the administration of a chemically defined liquid elemental dietBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Protein absorption and ammonia production: the effects of dietary protein and removal of the colonBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1976
- Progress report. Peptide absorption in man.Gut, 1974
- Intestinal transport of dipeptides in man: relative importance of hydrolysis and intact absorptionJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1971