Rule use in character classification: Are serial and parallel processing discrete?
Open Access
- 1 March 1974
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 2 (2), 249-254
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208991
Abstract
Contrary to predictions of a stochastic self-terminating search model, choice reaction times were lower for rulebound positive sets than for nonrulebound positive sets when memory set sizes were varied and stimulus probabilities were held constant. The result suggests that rule use and chunking, as opposed to probability alone, facilitate character classification. As a corollary, it is proposed that serial and parallel processing differ in degree rather than in kind. The extent to which the memory set has been chunked is the critical variable affecting Ss' scanning practices.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Memory scanning as a serial self-terminating process.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
- When item recognition and visual search functions are similarPerception & Psychophysics, 1972
- Reaction times for comparisons of successively presented visual patterns: Evidence for serial self-terminating searchPerception & Psychophysics, 1972
- The effect of memory load on reaction time in character classificationPerception & Psychophysics, 1972
- Stimulus versus response probability effects in choice reaction timePerception & Psychophysics, 1970
- Recognition reaction time for digits in consecutive and nonconsecutive memorized sets.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- Reaction time as a function of perceptual bias, response bias, and stimulus discriminability.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- Perceptual versus response bias in discrete choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- Sequential effects in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Paired-associate learning under simultaneous repetition and nonrepetition conditions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962