The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic Subjectivity
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organization
- Vol. 2 (2), 319-338
- https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849522013
Abstract
This paper uses elements of Weberian and Foucauldian social theory to speculate on the consequences of recent higher education change in the UK. We argue that changes in the political, institutional and funding environment have produced forms of HE organization that increase the power of management and diminish the autonomy of professional academics. These new forms of organization, which are increasingly bureaucratic and utilize sophisticated systems of surveillance, will make academics increasingly instrumental in their attitudes and behaviour. We conclude that the rationalization of HE should be resisted, but that nostalgia for a previous order should not be part of that resistance. `Mass' higher education organizations are not simply good or bad, but their rationale and consequences need to be clearly thought through if their negative aspects are to be addressed.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The UniversitiesDiscourse & Society, 1993
- The European and American University since 1800Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1993
- Managing the New Public ServicesPublished by Springer Nature ,1993
- Staff Development in Higher Education - Towards the Learning Organisation?Higher Education Quarterly, 1992
- Promotional CulturePublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Academics and their Labour ProcessPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Power and Subjectivity at Work: From Degradation to Subjugation in Social RelationsSociology, 1989
- The Higher Education SystemPublished by University of California Press ,1983
- Responsible Autonomy Versus Direct Control Over the Labour ProcessCapital & Class, 1977
- Labor and Monopoly CapitalMonthly Review, 1974