Abstract
Thin films of thermally grown have been studied by high resolution bright‐field electron microscopy. Contrast phenomena observed in images from 9 nm thick “dry” films are consistent with the existence of 1 nm pores, typically 10 nm apart. Similar films grown in a wet oxidizing ambient do not display this contrast. A pore structure had previously been suggested to explain differences in growth behavior and electrical properties between “wet” and “dry” . The reliable detection of such pores or voids in electron micrographs from amorphous materials is not straightforward and a novel approach which has been successfully applied to these films is described. A simple model which explains the appearance of pores only in “dry” films is proposed and is related to the trapping behavior of thicker films.