Stopping clinical trials because of treatment ineffectiveness: a comparison of a futility design with a method of stochastic curtailment
- 5 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (5), 677-687
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1429
Abstract
This paper introduces a simple futility design that allows a comparative clinical trial to be stopped due to lack of effect at any of a series of planned interim analyses. Stopping due to apparent benefit is not permitted. The design is for use when any positive claim should be based on the maximum sample size, for example to allow subgroup analyses or the evaluation of safety or secondary efficacy responses. A final frequentist analysis can be performed that is valid for the type of design employed. Here the design is described and its properties are presented. Its advantages and disadvantages relative to the use of stochastic curtailment are discussed. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Unifying Family of Group Sequential Test DesignsBiometrics, 1999
- The Design and Analysis of Sequential Clinical Trials.Biometrics, 1997
- Overrunning and underrunning in sequential clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1992
- Biopharmaceutical Sequential Statistical ApplicationsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1992
- The B-Value: A Tool for Monitoring DataBiometrics, 1988
- Monitoring clinical trials: Conditional or predictive power?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Stochastically curtailed tests in long–term clinical trialsCommunications in Statistics. Part C: Sequential Analysis, 1982
- Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1969