Image Fusion in Dual Energy Computed Tomography
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Investigative Radiology
- Vol. 44 (1), 1-6
- https://doi.org/10.1097/rli.0b013e31818c3d4b
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different weighting factors on contrast enhancement, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and image quality in image fusion in dual energy computed tomography (DECT) angiography. Fifteen patients underwent a CT angiography of the aorta with a SOMATOM Definition Dual Source CT (DSCT; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) in dual energy mode (DECT) (tube voltage: 80 and 140 kVp; tube current: 297 eff. mA and 70 eff. mA; collimation, 14 × 1.2 mm). Raw data were reconstructed using a soft convolution kernel (D30f). Fused images were calculated using a spectrum of weighting factors (0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1.0) generating different ratios between the 80- and 140-kVp images (eg, factor 0.5 corresponds to 50% image information from the 140- and the 80-kVp image). Both CT values and SNR were measured in the descending aorta (levels of celiac trunk, renal arteries, and aortic bifurcation), in the right and left common iliac artery and in paraaortal fat. Image quality was evaluated using a 5-point grading scale. Results were compared using paired t-tests and nonparametric paired Wilcoxon tests. Statistically significant increases in mean CT values were seen in vessels when increasing weighting factors were used (all P ≤ 0.001). For example, mean CT values derived from the aorta at the level of the celiac trunk were 273.8 ± 25.8 Hounsfield units (HU), 304.0 ± 24.3 HU, 361.4 ± 22.5 HU, 418.3 ± 25.8 HU, 477.8 ± 32.2 HU, 536.2 ± 41.2 HU, 564.6 ± 45.3 HU, when the weighting factors 0.0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9, and 1.0 were used. The highest SNR values were found in vessels when the weighting factor 0.5 was used. The highest SNR values of the paraaortal fat were obtained for the weighting factors 0.3 and 0.5. Visual image assessment for image quality showed the highest score for the data reconstructed using the weighting factor 0.5. Different weighting factors used to create fused images in DECT cause statistically significant differences in CT value, SNR, and image quality. Best results were obtained using the weighting factor 0.5, which we recommend for image fusion in DECT angiography.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of X-ray Tube Parameters, Iodine Concentration, and Patient Size on Image Quality in Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Chest-Phantom-StudyInvestigative Radiology, 2008
- Characterization of Human Renal Stones with MDCT: Advantage of Dual Energy and Limitations Due to Respiratory MotionAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2008
- Dual Energy CT Characterization of Urinary Calculi: Initial In Vitro and Clinical ExperienceInvestigative Radiology, 2008
- Dual-Energy Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for the Detection of Urinary Stone DiseaseInvestigative Radiology, 2007
- Noninvasive Differentiation of Uric Acid versus Non–Uric Acid Kidney Stones Using Dual-Energy CTAcademic Radiology, 2007
- Low Tube Voltage Improves Computed Tomography Imaging of Delayed Myocardial Contrast Enhancement in an Experimental Acute Myocardial Infarction ModelInvestigative Radiology, 2007
- Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experienceEuropean Radiology, 2006
- Abdominal CT with Low Tube Voltage: Preliminary Observations about Radiation Dose, Contrast Enhancement, Image Quality, and NoiseRadiology, 2005
- Multislice CT angiographyEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2000
- A Quantitative Theory of the Hounsfield Unit and Its Application to Dual Energy ScanningJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1977