Short-Term Changes in Ki-67 during Neoadjuvant Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer with Anastrozole or Tamoxifen Alone or Combined Correlate with Recurrence-Free Survival
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 January 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 11 (2), 951s-958s
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.951s.11.2
Abstract
Purpose: Neoadjuvant (preoperative) therapy for breast cancer may allow for the development of intermediate markers of treatment benefit, thereby circumventing the need for efficacy trials of adjuvant therapy, which require much larger patient numbers and longer follow-up. The aim of this study—as part of the Immediate Preoperative “Arimidex” (anastrozole), Tamoxifen, or Arimidex Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) trial (n = 330)—was to test the hypotheses that changes in Ki-67 after 2 weeks and/or 12 weeks: (i) differed between treatments, (ii) predicted clinical tumor response, and/or (iii) may predict long-term outcome differences between treatments in adjuvant therapy.Experimental Design: The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial compared these same agents in the adjuvant setting. Biomarkers were measured in biopsy specimens taken before and after 2 and 12 weeks of treatment.Results: Suppression of the proliferation marker Ki-67 after 2 and 12 weeks was significantly greater with anastrozole than with tamoxifen (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001) but was similar between tamoxifen and the combination (P = 0.600 and P = 0.912). This result closely parallels that seen for the relative recurrence-free survival with the treatments after a median follow-up of 31 months in the ATAC trial in 9,366 patients. Against expectations, apoptosis was not increased in any of the treatment arms.Conclusions: The data indicate that short-term changes in proliferation in the neoadjuvant setting may be able to predict outcome during adjuvant use of the same treatments. If this can be confirmed, these findings could lead to a profound change in approaches to drug development in breast cancer. The data indicate that estrogen is not an important survival factor for human breast cancer cells.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gene Expression Profiles Predict Complete Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel and Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide Chemotherapy in Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Minichromosome Maintenance Protein 2 Is a Strong Independent Prognostic Marker in Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early‐stage breast cancerCancer, 2003
- Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: first results of the ATAC randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Ki67 protein: the immaculate deception?Histopathology, 2002
- Apoptosis and proliferation as predictors of chemotherapy response in patients with breast carcinomaCancer, 2000
- Idoxifene antagonism of oestradiol-dependent MCF-7 breast cancer xenograft growthEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1998
- Integrated control of cell proliferation and cell death by the c- myc oncogenePhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1994
- Apoptosis in breast cancer as related to histopathological characteristics and prognosisEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1994
- Apoptosis in Toremifene-Induced Growth Inhibition of Human Breast Cancer Cells In Vivo and In VitroJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993