OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE PERFORMANCE AS INFLUENCED BY DRUG‐INDUCED VARIATIONS IN ACTIVATION LEVEL
- 1 March 1966
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 7 (1), 168-178
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1966.tb01350.x
Abstract
Performance was measured by seven sensorimotor and perceptual tests given to 30 students in six successive trials, spread over five hours, before and after the intake of either 15 mg dexamphetamine, zoo mg Pentobarbitone, or a placebo. Subjective performance, level of aspiration, wakefulness, and mood were measured by a scaling method. A close agreement was found between the amount of objective and subjective improvement following dexamphetamine, whereas the objective impairment induced by Pentobarbitone was not reflected in the subjective measures. These results were examined in relation to the other indices of activation.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- INTERINDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN CATECHOLAMINE EXCRETION DURING STRESSScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1965
- Physiological, Behavioral, and Subjective Indices of Activation in Habituation ExperimentsPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1965
- Lateral Dominance and Right-Left Discrimination: A Comparison of Normal and Retarded ReadersPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1964
- TIME RELATIONS OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE REACTIONS TO D-AMPHETAMINE AND PENTOBARBITONEScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1964
- Psychophysiological changes during infusions of adrenaline in various dosesPsychopharmacology, 1963
- Effects of alcohol intake on subjective and objective variables over a five-hour periodPsychopharmacology, 1963
- PSYCHOLOGIC EFFECTS OF AMPHETAMINES AND BARBITURATESJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1962
- Activation: A neuropsychological dimension.Psychological Review, 1959
- The psychological significance of the concept of "arousal" or "activation."Psychological Review, 1957
- Drives and the C. N. S. (conceptual nervous system).Psychological Review, 1955