Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Social Research Methodology
- Vol. 8 (1), 19-32
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
Abstract
This paper focuses on scoping studies, an approach to reviewing the literature which to date has received little attention in the research methods literature. We distinguish between different types of scoping studies and indicate where these stand in relation to full systematic reviews. We outline a framework for conducting a scoping study based on our recent experiences of reviewing the literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems. Where appropriate, our approach to scoping the field is contrasted with the procedures followed in systematic reviews. We emphasize how including a consultation exercise in this sort of study may enhance the results, making them more useful to policy makers, practitioners and service users. Finally, we consider the advantages and limitations of the approach and suggest that a wider debate is called for about the role of the scoping study in relation to other types of literature reviews.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence-based Policy: In Search of a MethodEvaluation, 2002
- Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problemsJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2001
- Should All Literature Reviews be Systematic?Evaluation & Research in Education, 2000
- A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarctionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992