Digital Rectal Examination and the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer—a Study Based on 8 Years and Three Screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam
- 31 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Urology
- Vol. 55 (1), 139-147
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.079
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason ≥7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 menBJU International, 2007
- Does PSA Velocity Predict Prostate Cancer in Pre-Screened Populations?European Urology, 2006
- A comparison of first and repeat (four years later) prostate cancer screening in a randomized cohort of a symptomatic men aged 55–75 years using a biopsy indication of 3.0 ng/ml (results of ERSPC, Rotterdam)The Prostate, 2005
- Is it necessary to separate clinical stage T1c from T2 prostate adenocarcinoma?BJU International, 2005
- How accurately does prostate biopsy Gleason score predict pathologic findings and disease free survival?The Prostate, 2001
- Tumor characteristics in screening for prostate cancer with and without rectal examination as an initial screening test at low PSA (0.0-3.9 ng/ml)The Prostate, 2001
- CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS, AND RECURRENCE RATES OF STAGE T1C VERSUS T2A OR T2B PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 1999
- DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION FOR DETECTING PROSTATE CANCER AT PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS OF 4 NG./ML. OR LESSJournal of Urology, 1999
- Systematic 5 Region Prostate Biopsy is Superior to Sextant Method for Diagnosing Carcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1997