Using pseudo‐data to correct for publication bias in meta‐analysis
- 28 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 25 (22), 3798-3813
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2487
Abstract
In many ways, adjustment for publication bias in meta-analysis parallels adjustment for ascertainment bias in genetic studies. We investigate a previously published simulation-based method for dealing with complex ascertainment bias and show that it can be modified for use in meta-analysis when publication bias is suspected. The method involves simulating sets of pseudo-data under the assumed model using guesses for the unknown parameters. The pseudo-data are subjected to the same selection criteria as are believed to have operated on the original data. A conditional likelihood is then used to estimate the adjusted values of the unknown parameters. This method is used to re-analyse a published meta-analysis of the effect of the MTHFR gene on homocysteine levels. Simulation studies show that the pseudo-data method is unbiased; they give an indication of the number of pseudo-data values required and suggest that a two-stage adjustment produces less variable estimates. This method can be thought of as an example of the selection model approach to publication bias correction. As the selection mechanism must be assumed, it is important to investigate the sensitivity of any conclusions to this assumption. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Integrated Approach to the Meta-Analysis of Genetic Association Studies using Mendelian RandomizationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Conditional likelihood inference under complex ascertainment using data augmentationBiometrika, 2003
- Homocysteine and cardiovascular disease: evidence on causality from a meta-analysisBMJ, 2002
- A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- What Works?: Selectivity Models and Meta-AnalysisJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1999
- Publication bias in meta-analysis: a Bayesian data-augmentation approach to account for issues exemplified in the passive smoking debateStatistical Science, 1997
- Selection Models and the File Drawer ProblemStatistical Science, 1988
- Estimation of Effect Size under Nonrandom Sampling: The Effects of Censoring Studies Yielding Statistically Insignificant Mean DifferencesJournal of Educational Statistics, 1984
- Estimation of Effect Size under Nonrandom Sampling: The Effects of Censoring Studies Yielding Statistically Insignificant Mean DifferencesJournal of Educational Statistics, 1984