Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adults
- 27 September 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 274 (12), 968-974
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530120060042
Abstract
Objective. —To examine the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Design and Setting. —Inception cohort study from a 2-month prospective survey of 11 828 consecutive admissions to 170 adult ICUs of public hospitals in France. Patients. —Patients meeting clinical criteria for severe sepsis were included and classified as having documented infection (ie, documented severe sepsis, n=742), or a clinical diagnosis of infection without microbiological documentation (ie, culture-negative severe sepsis, n=310). Main Outcome Measures. —Hospital and 28-day mortality after severe sepsis. Results. —Clinically suspected sepsis and confirmed severe sepsis occurred in 9.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.5) and 6.3 (95% CI, 5.8 to 6.7) of 100 ICU admissions, respectively. The 28-day mortality was 56% (95% CI, 52% to 60%) in patients with severe sepsis, and 60% (95% CI, 55% to 66%) in those with culture-negative severe sepsis. Major determinants of both early (P<.001) and shock (P=.03), whereas secondary deaths were associated with the admission category (P<.001), a rapidly or ultimately fatal underlying disease (P<.001), a preexisting liver (P=.01) or cardiovascular (P=.002) insufficiency, hypothermia (P=.02), thrombocytopenia (P=.01), and multiple sources of infection (P=.02). In patients with documented sepsis, bacteremia was associated with early mortality (P=.03). Conclusions. —Only three of four patients presenting with clinically suspected severe sepsis have documented infection. However, patients with clinically suspected sepsis but without microbiological documentation and patients with documented infection share common risk factors and are at similarly high risk of death. In addition to the severity of illness score, acute organ failures and the characteristics of underlying diseases should be accounted for in stratification of patients and outcome analyses. (JAMA. 1995;274:968-974)Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The natural history of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). A prospective studyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Selected Treatment Strategies for Septic Shock Based on Proposed Mechanisms of PathogenesisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- Prophylactic Intravenous Administration of Standard Immune Globulin as Compared with Core-Lipopolysaccharide Immune Globulin in Patients at High Risk of Postsurgical InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in SepsisChest, 1992
- Evaluation of Definitions for SepsisChest, 1992
- Sepsis, the Sepsis Syndrome, Multi-Organ Failure: A Plea for Comparable DefinitionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- A Three-Year Study of Positive Blood Cultures, with Emphasis on PrognosisClinical Infectious Diseases, 1990
- Prognosis in Acute Organ-System FailureAnnals of Surgery, 1985
- The Clinical Significance of Positive Blood Cultures: A Comprehensive Analysis of 500 Episodes of Bacteremia and Fungemia in Adults. II. Clinical Observations, with Special Reference to Factors Influencing PrognosisClinical Infectious Diseases, 1983