Neuroleptics and operant behavior: The anhedonia hypothesis
- 1 March 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 5 (1), 39-53
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00010372
Abstract
Neuroleptic drugs disrupt the learning and performance of operant habits motivated by a variety of positive reinforcers, including food, water, brain stimulation, intravenous opiates, stimulants, and barbiturates. This disruption has been demonstrated in several kinds of experiments with doses that do not significantly limit normal response capacity. With continuous reinforcement neuroleptics gradually cause responding to cease, as in extinction or satiation. This pattern is not due to satiation, however, because it also occurs with nonsatiating reinforcement (such as saccharin or brain stimulation). Repeated tests with neuroleptics result in earlier and earlier response cessation reminiscent of the kind of decreased resistance to extinction caused by repeated tests without the expected reward. Indeed, withholding reward can have the same effect on responding under later neuroleptic treatment as prior experience with neuroleptics themselves; this suggests that there is a transfer of learning (really unlearning) from nonreward to neuroleptic conditions. These tests under continuous reinforcement schedules suggest that neuroleptics blunt the ability of reinforcers to sustain responding at doses which largely spare the ability of the animal to initiate responding. Animals trained under partial reinforcement, however, do not respond as well during neuroleptic testing as animals trained under continuous reinforcement. Thus, neuroleptics can also impair responding (though not responsecapacity) that is normally sustained by environmental stimuli (and associated expectancies) in the absence of the primary reinforcer. Neuroleptics also blunt the euphoric impact of amphetamine in humans. These data suggest that the most subtle and interesting effect of neuroleptics is a selective attenuation of motivational arousal which is (a) critical for goal-directed behavior, (b) normally induced by reinforcers and associated environmental stimuli, and (c) normally accompanied by the subjective experience of pleasure. Because these drugs are used to treat schizophrenia and because they cause parkinsonian-like side effects, this action has implications for a better understanding of human pathology as well as normal motivational processes.Keywords
This publication has 102 references indexed in Scilit:
- Heroin reward is dependent on a dopaminergic substrateLife Sciences, 1981
- Mesencephalic dopaminergic unit activity in the behaviorally conditioned ratLife Sciences, 1981
- Intracranial self-administration of morphine into the ventral tegmental area in ratsLife Sciences, 1981
- Small-dose intravenous heroin facilitates hypothalamic self-stimulation without response suppression in ratsLife Sciences, 1981
- The hypotheses of different dopamine receptor mechanismsLife Sciences, 1981
- A reexamination of apomorphine induced stereotypy in the rat in light of self administration experimentsProgress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology, 1979
- Minireview A systematic study of the pharmacological activities of dopamine antagonistsLife Sciences, 1979
- Acute and chronic haloperidol treatment: Comparison of effects on nigral dopaminergic cell activityLife Sciences, 1978
- Apparent independence of opiate reinforcement and electrical self-stimulation systems in rat brainLife Sciences, 1977
- Catecholaminergic mechanisms of reinforcement: Direct assessment by drug self-administrationLife Sciences, 1977