An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis
- 1 September 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Human–Computer Interaction
- Vol. 7 (3), 257-280
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0703_1
Abstract
This study reports the results of a meta-analysis of experimental studies published between 1980 and 1990 that focused on the relationship between electronic group support systems (GSS) use and group process and outcomes. The study examines the following specific group process and outcome variables: degree of task focus, equality of participation, time to decision, decision quality, consensus, and member satisfaction. GSS was found to increase decision quality, time needed to reach decisions, equality of participation, and degree of task focus and to decrease consensus and satisfaction. Implications of the findings are discussed in terms of directions for future research and improvements in the reporting of research results.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electronic meeting systemsCommunications of the ACM, 1991
- Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990
- ELECTRONIC VS. NON-ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING.Academy of Management Proceedings, 1990
- Meta-analysis: Magic wand or exploratory tool? Comment on Markus et al.Journal of Family Therapy, 1990
- Information Technology to Support Electronic MeetingsMIS Quarterly, 1988
- Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- Group processes in computer-mediated communicationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986
- Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- Meta-analysis: A reflection on problemsAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1984
- Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes.Psychological Bulletin, 1984