A comparison of mark - recapture distance-sampling methods applied to aerial surveys of eastern grey kangaroos
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by CSIRO Publishing in Wildlife Research
- Vol. 35 (4), 320-330
- https://doi.org/10.1071/wr07078
Abstract
Wildlife Research provides an international forum for the publication of original and significant research and debate on the ecology and management of wild animals in natural and modified habitats. Readers can expect a broad range of high quality, internationally refereed papers that contribute conceptual and practical advances to our knowledge and understanding of wildlife ecology and managementKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The influence of animal mobility on the assumption of uniform distances in aerial line-transect surveysWildlife Research, 2008
- Visibility bias in aerial survey: mark - recapture, line-transect or both?Wildlife Research, 2008
- Detectability of penguins in aerial surveys over the pack-ice off AntarcticaWildlife Research, 2008
- Mark-Recapture Models for Line Transect SurveysPublished by JSTOR ,1998
- Horvitz-Thompson Estimators for Double-Platform Line Transect SurveysPublished by JSTOR ,1998
- An assessment of the accuracy of kangaroo surveys using fixed-wing aircraftWildlife Research, 1998
- Comparison of Surveys of Kangaroos in Queensland Using Helicopters and Fixed-Wing Aircraft.The Rangeland Journal, 1998
- Aerial survey methodology and the cost of control for feral goats in Western QueenslandWildlife Research, 1998
- Correcting Bias in Aerial Survey Population Estimates of Feral Livestock in Northern Australia Using the Double-Count TechniqueJournal of Applied Ecology, 1989
- Correcting for Visibility Bias in Strip Transect Aerial Surveys of Aquatic FaunaThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1989