Designing ligands to bind proteins
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
- Vol. 38 (4), 385-395
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033583506004240
Abstract
The ability to design drugs (so-called ‘rational drug design’) has been one of the long-term objectives of chemistry for 50 years. It is an exceptionally difficult problem, and many of its parts lie outside the expertise of chemistry. The much more limited problem – how to design tight-binding ligands (rational ligand design) – would seem to be one that chemistry could solve, but has also proved remarkably recalcitrant. The question is ‘Why is it so difficult?’ and the answer is ‘We still don't entirely know’. This perspective discusses some of the technical issues – potential functions, protein plasticity, enthalpy/entropy compensation, and others – that contribute, and suggests areas where fundamental understanding of protein–ligand interactions falls short of what is needed. It surveys recent technological developments (in particular, isothermal titration calorimetry) that will, hopefully, make now the time for serious progress in this area. It concludes with the calorimetric examination of the association of a series of systematically varied ligands with a model protein. The counterintuitive thermodynamic results observed serve to illustrate that, even in relatively simple systems, understanding protein–ligand association is challenging.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Are Proteins Charged? Networks of Charge–Charge Interactions in Proteins Measured by Charge Ladders and Capillary ElectrophoresisAngewandte Chemie International Edition, 2006
- The Paradoxical Thermodynamic Basis for the Interaction of Ethylene Glycol, Glycine, and Sarcosine Chains with Bovine Carbonic Anhydrase II: An Unexpected Manifestation of Enthalpy/Entropy CompensationJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2006
- Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assemblyNature, 2005
- On the Value of c: Can Low Affinity Systems Be Studied by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry?Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2003
- Binding Affinities of Host–Guest, Protein–Ligand, and Protein–Transition‐State ComplexesAngewandte Chemie International Edition, 2003
- A Perspective on Enzyme CatalysisScience, 2003
- A View of the Hydrophobic EffectThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2001
- Significant discrepancies between van't hoff and calorimetric enthalpies. IIProtein Science, 1995
- Win some, lose some: enthalpy-entropy compensation in weak intermolecular interactionsChemistry & Biology, 1995
- Kinetic aspects of structure─activity relations: the binding of sulphonamides by carbonic anhydraseProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1976