Comparative audit: An experimental study of 147882 general surgical admissions during 1990
- 1 October 1992
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 79 (10), 1073-1076
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800791028
Abstract
In 1991,1025 general surgical Fellows of The Royal College of Surgeons of England were circulated with a pro forma and asked to submit local audit results for admissions during 1990 to a confidential comparative audit service. The individual topics of cholecystectomy and colorectal resection were studied. Data returned by 160 surgeons concerned 147882 admissions including 122620 operations. Overall mortality rates ranged from 0 to 5 per cent and morbidity rates from 0 to 22 per cent. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with one-quarter of the mortality rate and two-thirds the morbidity rate of open cholecystectomy. Of the 33 surgeons who responded to a survey after the presentation of results, all wished to continue the exercise in future years; 39 per cent had been stimulated to perform further analyses and 15 per cent had changed practice habits as a result. Comparative audit involving large numbers of patients and surgeons is feasible and seems beneficial to participants.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The european experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1991
- Caseload or workload? Scoring complexity of operative procedures as a means of analysing workload.BMJ, 1990
- Audit of a surgical firm by microcomputer: five years' experienceBMJ, 1988
- Development of a Microcomputer-Based System for Surgical Audit and Patient Administration: A ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1987
- Combined computer generated discharge documents and surgical audit.BMJ, 1986
- Surgical audit: Comparison of the work load and results of two hospitals in the same district.BMJ, 1980