Disease Control Rate at 8 Weeks Predicts Clinical Benefit in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From Southwest Oncology Group Randomized Trials
- 20 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 26 (3), 463-467
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.13.0344
Abstract
Tumor shrinkage categorized as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) is a fundamental efficacy measure for new cancer treatments and often considered a surrogate for overall survival. However, for any given treatment, many more patients typically achieve stable disease (SD) or have progressive disease (PD) than achieve response. We hypothesized that PD (or its converse, disease control rate [DCR], consisting of CR, PR, SD) is a stronger predictor of survival than response alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and that this determination might be assessable early on during therapy. Data from 984 NSCLC patients entered onto three randomized Southwest Oncology Group trials of platinum-based chemotherapy were pooled and subjected to Landmark survival analysis. Patients were categorized according to proportions alive at weeks 8, 14, and 20 after registration, as well as response status. Elements were fitted into a Cox proportional hazards model. Tumor response (CR, PR) was seen in 260 patients (27%). Median time to response, time to progression, and survival time were 2.0, 4.3 and 8.9 months, respectively. Median survival times among patients with CR/PR, SD, or PD were 13.5, 8.4, and 3.1 months, respectively. Of 892 patients alive at week 8, DCR was 62%. Although CR/PR at week 8 was associated with longer survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61; P < .001), DCR was superior in predicting survival (HR = 0.45; P < .0001). DCR at week 8 is a more powerful predictor of subsequent survival than is the traditional tumor response rate in advanced NSCLC and provides an early assessment of subsequent outcome.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Erlotinib in Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in Measurement of Non–Small-Cell Carcinoma Lung Lesions: Implications for Assessment of Tumor ResponseJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Measuring the clinical response. What does it mean?European Journal Of Cancer, 2002
- Phase III Comparative Study of High-Dose Cisplatin Versus a Combination of Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Southwest Oncology Group standard response criteria, endpoint definitions and toxicity criteriaInvestigational New Drugs, 1992
- A randomized study comparing cisplatin or carboplatin with etoposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Protocol 07861.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Comparing survival of responders and nonresponders after treatment: A potential source of confusion in interpreting cancer clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1983
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981
- Appraisal of methods for the study of chemotherapy of cancer in man: Comparative therapeutic trial of nitrogen mustard and triethylene thiophosphoramideJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1960