Phase II study of amonafide: results of treatment and lessons learned from the study of an investigational agent in previously untreated patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer.
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 8 (3), 390-395
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1990.8.3.390
Abstract
Thirteen previously untreated patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were treated with the investigational agent amonafide in a dose of 300 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) over 1 hour daily for 5 consecutive days. No responses were seen in 12 eligible patients. Myelosuppression was only occasionally seen. Other toxicities included diaphoresis, chest pain, local irritation at the injection site, arthralgias, nausea and vomiting, and neuromuscular problems. There were two early deaths, both attributable to tumor progression with resultant obstruction of a vital structure. Ten patients crossed over to alternate active therapy (etoposide [VP-16]-cisplatin) and five responded. The median survival time (MST) of the whole group of treated patients was 31 weeks. In future trials of investigational new drugs in previously untreated SCLC, we recommend that patients with the following characteristics be excluded: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 2, 3, and 4; superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction; any major paraneoplastic syndrome; serious comorbid illness; and extensive hepatic involvement by tumor. The trial design should include prompt crossover to active alternative therapy, such as VP-16 and cisplatin, for disease progression or for failure to respond after two treatment cycles. Also, the trial design should use an early stopping rule based on interest in identifying only very active agents with a minimum response rate of 30%.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase I clinical investigation of amonafide.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1989
- VP-16 and carboplatin in previously untreated patients with extensive small cell lung cancer: a study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials GroupBritish Journal of Cancer, 1988
- Superiority of Alternating Non-Cross-Resistant Chemotherapy in Extensive Small Cell Lung CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Phase II study of 1,2,4-triglycidylurazol (TGU) previously untreated and treated patients with small cell lung cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1987
- RANDOMIZED DOSE-RESPONSE EVALUATION OF ETOPOSIDE IN SMALL CELL-CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG - A SOUTHEASTERN CANCER STUDY-GROUP TRIAL1986
- Etoposide (VP-16) and cisplatin: an effective treatment for relapse in small-cell lung cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1982
- VP-16-213 MONOTHERAPY FOR REMISSION INDUCTION OF SMALL CELL LUNG-CANCER - RANDOMIZED TRIAL USING 3 DOSAGE SCHEDULES1978