The cognitive psychology of gambling
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Gambling Studies
- Vol. 6 (1), 31-42
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01015747
Abstract
A number of recent studies have shown there may be a strong cognitive bias in explaining persistent gambling. Theories that have been put forward include the illusion of control, “cognitive regret,” biased evaluations and the “psychology of the near miss.” Two exploratory studies examining the acquisition, development and maintenance of gambling behaviour involving adolescent fruit machine gamblers were carried out. Those factors which directly relate to the cognitive biases (notably erroneous beliefs about skill) during gambling activity are discussed with reference to the above cognitive influences.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gambling in children and adolescentsJournal of Gambling Studies, 1989
- Gambling: Relationship Between the Frequency of Wins and Irrational ThinkingThe Journal of Psychology, 1988
- Effects of limited and unlimited stakes on gambling behaviorJournal of Gambling Studies, 1988
- Gambling behaviors among high school students in the Quebec areaJournal of Gambling Studies, 1988
- The psychology of the near missJournal of Gambling Studies, 1986
- Plasma endorphin levels in pathological gamblingJournal of Gambling Studies, 1986
- Arousal and Sensation-Seeking Components in the General Explanation of Gambling and Gambling AddictionsInternational Journal of the Addictions, 1986
- Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- The illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Craps and MagicAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1967