Comparative Analysis of Day-to-Day Trip-Chaining Behavior of Urban Commuters in Two Cities
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Vol. 1607 (1), 163-170
- https://doi.org/10.3141/1607-22
Abstract
The day-to-day variation in automobile commuter trip-chaining behavior is investigated. Models are developed to relate trip-chaining patterns to three types of factors: ( a) socioeconomic characteristics, ( b) workplace conditions, and ( c) traffic system characteristics. The analysis is based on a diary survey of commuters in Dallas, Texas. The transferability of commuter trip-chaining behavior is also examined through comparison with results of a previous study conducted in Austin, Texas. Commuters engaged in many nonwork stops during commuting trips, indicating that trip chaining is an essential characteristic of commuting behavior. The analysis reveals that socioeconomic attributes, workplace conditions, and commuter preference exert similar influences in the two cities, whereas traffic system characteristics (namely, no-stop travel time) have different influences on morning stop frequency behavior in the two cities. For the evening, no attributes were found to have significantly different effects between Austin and Dallas.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparability and Transferability of Commuter Behavior Characteristics between Cities: Departure Time and Route-Switching DecisionsTransportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1996
- Poisson analysis of commuter flexibility in changing routes and departure timesTransportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1989
- Experiments with departure time choice dynamics of urban commutersTransportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1986
- Dynamic User Equilibrium Departure Time and Route Choice on Idealized Traffic ArterialsTransportation Science, 1984
- Parameters of activity behavior for use in travel analysisTransportation Research Part A: General, 1982
- A Model of the Demand for Retail Facilities, Incorporating Multistop, Multipurpose TripsGeographical Analysis, 1981
- A utility maximizing model of the demand for multi-destination non-work travelTransportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1980
- Poisson Regression Analysis Under Alternate Sampling StrategiesTransportation Science, 1980
- Spatial Diversification and Multipurpose Travel: Implications for Choice TheoryGeographical Analysis, 1980
- TRIP PURPOSES AND URBAN ACTIVITY LINKAGESAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 1972