Chinese Peasants and the Closed Community: An Open and Shut Case
- 1 July 1971
- journal article
- peasantry
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Comparative Studies in Society and History
- Vol. 13 (3), 270-281
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417500006289
Abstract
Our repertoire of concepts and theories concerning peasantries has been built up through contributions from scholars working in many parts of the world. Latin Americanists and India-wallahs, in particular, have played a major role in the development of models, but we have also heard from specialists in Indonesia, Japan, Europe, the Mediterranean world, and even Africa. But where is China in all this ? Why are students of the world's largest peasantry silent? In part, it is because we are so few and too preoccupied with our own peasants to have time for anybody else's. More to the point, however, the whole body of inherited anthropological wisdom concerning peasantries seems somehow alien and irrelevant to students of Chinese society.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Political Relation of the Village to the StateWorld Politics, 1967
- Marketing and Social Structure in Rural China, Part IJournal of Asian Studies, 1964
- The Ladder of Success in Imperial ChinaPublished by Columbia University Press ,1962
- Closed Corporate Peasant Communities in Mesoamerica and Central JavaSouthwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1957
- Types of Latin American Peasantry: A Preliminary Discussion*American Anthropologist, 1955