How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies.
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Vol. 2 (3), 145-154
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021875026135
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy of Birth Certificate Data Regarding the Amount, Timing, and Adequacy of Prenatal Care Using Prenatal Clinic Medical Records as ReferentsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1997
- Behavior and interpretation of the κ statistic: Resolution of the two paradoxesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Do providers adhere to ACOG standards? The case of prenatal care.1994
- An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index.American Journal of Public Health, 1994
- Variations in the Accuracy of Obstetric Procedures and Diagnoses on Birth Records in Washington State, 1989American Journal of Epidemiology, 1993
- Comparability of the birth certificate and 1988 Maternal and Infant Health Survey.1993
- From the Centers for Disease Control. Pregnancy risks determined from birth certificate data--United States, 1989.1992
- Completeness of the Discharge Diagnoses as a Measure of Birth Defects Recorded in the Hospital Birth RecordAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1991
- Evaluation of the hospital discharge diagnoses index and the birth certificate as sources of information on birth defects.1990
- Accuracy of birth certificate data for detecting facial cleft defects in Arkansas children.1979