Publication of clinical trials: accountability and accessibility
- 13 September 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 256 (4), 271-283
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01392.x
Abstract
Publication of findings from clinical trials is a necessary step in the research continuum, to provide a record of the work done, convey information to the community, and support translation of research into clinical practice. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials are now widely regarded as the highest level of evidence in determining the effect of an intervention on an outcome. They largely depend on internationally accessible, published reports of all trials undertaken. Investigators and their institutions or organizations have responsibility for reporting their clinical trials accurately and completely, including disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. To ensure evidence-based health care, issues relating to accessibility and accountability of clinical trial results require immediate action.Keywords
This publication has 110 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Why PLoS Became a PublisherPLoS Biology, 2003
- Multiple Authors, Multiple ProblemsScience, 2003
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Reanalysis of a Muitireported Trial on Home Uterine Activity MonitoringBirth, 1993
- Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boardsJAMA, 1992
- Reporting on Methods in Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Statistical evaluation of medical journal manuscriptsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1966