Visual acuity from far to near and contrast sensitivity in eyes with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with a low addition power
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 35 (12), 2070-2076
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.07.010
Abstract
To compare visual acuity from far to near, contrast visual acuity, and acuity in the presence of glare (glare visual acuity) between an aspheric diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a low addition (add) power (+3.0 diopters) and a monofocal IOL. Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan. This prospective study comprised patients having implantation of an aspheric diffractive multifocal ReSTOR SN6AD1 IOL with a +3.0 D add (multifocal group) or a monofocal AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL (monofocal group). Visual acuity from far to near distances, contrast acuity, and glare acuity were evaluated 3 months postoperatively. Each IOL group comprised 64 eyes of 32 patients. For monocular and binocular visual acuity, the mean uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate acuity at 0.5 m and the near acuity at 0.3 m were significantly better in the multifocal group than in the monofocal group (P≤.0035); distance and intermediate acuity at 0.7 m and 1.0 m were similar between the 2 groups. No significant differences were observed between groups in contrast acuity and glare acuity under photopic and mesopic conditions. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between all-distance acuity and pupil diameter or between visual acuity and IOL decentration and tilt. The diffractive multifocal IOL with a low add power provided significantly better intermediate and near visual acuity than the monofocal IOL. Contrast sensitivity with and without glare was reduced with the multifocal IOL, and all-distance visual acuity was independent of pupil diameter and IOL displacement.This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- All-distance visual acuity in eyes with a nontinted or a yellow-tinted diffractive multifocal intraocular lensJapanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2009
- Postoperative corneal shape changes: Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgeryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2009
- Functional vision with bilateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses 6 months after cataract surgeryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2007
- Symmetric bilateral implantation of a distance-dominant diffractive bifocal intraocular lensJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2007
- Functional outcomes after implantation of Tecnis ZM900 and Array SA40 multifocal intraocular lensesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2007
- Optimum target refraction for highly and moderately myopic patients after monofocal intraocular lens implantationJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2007
- Depth of focus in eyes with diffractive bifocal and refractive multifocal intraocular lensesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2006
- Visual Performance of AcrySof ReSTOR Apodized Diffractive IOL: A Prospective Comparative TrialAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2006
- European Multicenter Study of the AcrySof ReSTOR Apodized Diffractive Intraocular LensOphthalmology, 2006
- Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgeryOphthalmology, 2003