A Comparison of the PCL-Retaining AGC and Posterior Stabilizing Legacy Prostheses for Total Knee Arthroplasty
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery
- Vol. 2 (2), 127-129
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-006-9002-7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The PCL significantly affects the functional outcome of total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2004
- Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2004
- Mid-term results of an AGC total knee arthroplasty system survival and function analysis: 2- to 8-year follow-up resultsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2003
- Long-Term Results of Posterior Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee ArthroplastyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2002
- Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2002
- Ten to fourteen year survival and functional analysis of the AGC total knee replacement systemThe Knee, 2002
- Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee ReplacementClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001
- Long-Term Followup of Anatomic Graduated Components Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee ReplacementClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001
- The AGC total knee prosthesis at average 11 yearsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2000
- Bilateral Total Knee ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1991