A review of two journals found that articles using multivariable logistic regression frequently did not report commonly recommended assumptions
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 57 (11), 1147-1152
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.05.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Balance and mobility performance as treatable risk factors for recurrent falling in older personsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Influence of race, clinical, and other socio-demographic features on trial participationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Statistical methods in public health and epidemiology: a look at the recent past and projections for the next decadeStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2000
- Logistic regression models in obstetrics and gynecology literatureObstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Logistic regression models used in medical research are poorly presentedBMJ, 1996
- Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Multivariate Statistical Analysis for Pathologists:Part I, The Logistic ModelAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1996
- Proportional hazards (Cox) regressionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1993
- Standardizing Criteria for Logistic Regression ModelsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1993
- The Risk of Determining Risk with Multivariable ModelsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1993