In-Center Hemodialysis Six Times per Week versus Three Times per Week
Top Cited Papers
- 9 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 363 (24), 2287-2300
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1001593
Abstract
In this randomized clinical trial, we aimed to determine whether increasing the frequency of in-center hemodialysis would result in beneficial changes in left ventricular mass, self-reported physical health, and other intermediate outcomes among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo hemodialysis six times per week (frequent hemodialysis, 125 patients) or three times per week (conventional hemodialysis, 120 patients) for 12 months. The two coprimary composite outcomes were death or change (from baseline to 12 months) in left ventricular mass, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and death or change in the physical-health composite score of the RAND 36-item health survey. Secondary outcomes included cognitive performance; self-reported depression; laboratory markers of nutrition, mineral metabolism, and anemia; blood pressure; and rates of hospitalization and of interventions related to vascular access. Patients in the frequent-hemodialysis group averaged 5.2 sessions per week; the weekly standard Kt/Vurea (the product of the urea clearance and the duration of the dialysis session normalized to the volume of distribution of urea) was significantly higher in the frequent-hemodialysis group than in the conventional-hemodialysis group (3.54±0.56 vs. 2.49±0.27). Frequent hemodialysis was associated with significant benefits with respect to both coprimary composite outcomes (hazard ratio for death or increase in left ventricular mass, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.82; hazard ratio for death or a decrease in the physical-health composite score, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.92). Patients randomly assigned to frequent hemodialysis were more likely to undergo interventions related to vascular access than were patients assigned to conventional hemodialysis (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.73). Frequent hemodialysis was associated with improved control of hypertension and hyperphosphatemia. There were no significant effects of frequent hemodialysis on cognitive performance, self-reported depression, serum albumin concentration, or use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Frequent hemodialysis, as compared with conventional hemodialysis, was associated with favorable results with respect to the composite outcomes of death or change in left ventricular mass and death or change in a physical-health composite score but prompted more frequent interventions related to vascular access. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00264758.)Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of SF-36 and SF-12 Composite Scores and Subsequent Hospitalization and Mortality Risks in Long-Term Dialysis PatientsClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2010
- Functional Status of Elderly Adults before and after Initiation of DialysisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Effect of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis vs Conventional Hemodialysis on Left Ventricular Mass and Quality of LifeJAMA, 2007
- Effects of Short Daily versus Conventional Hemodialysis on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Inflammatory MarkersJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2005
- Left ventricular mass monitoring in the follow-up of dialysis patients: Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy progressionKidney International, 2004
- Nightly home hemodialysis: Five and one‐half years of experience in Lynchburg, VirginiaHemodialysis International, 2004
- Comorbidity assessment using the Index of Coexistent Diseases in a multicenter clinical trialKidney International, 2001
- The Quality of Life of Patients with End-Stage Renal DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Competition and efficiency in the end stage renal disease programJournal of Health Economics, 1983
- Effect of the Hemodialysis Prescription on Patient MorbidityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981