Comparison of Four Orthogonal Systems of Vectorcardiography
- 1 January 1958
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 17 (1), 46-54
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.17.1.46
Abstract
Four orthogonal systems of vectorcardiography that are considered to be more accurate than the tetrahedron and cube systems were compared. In a large majority of subjects the records made with each of the 4 systems were similar. However, in 5 of 60 subjects in whom the Z lead was studied, dissimilarities were found that were considered to be significant. The possible reasons for these dissimilarities are discussed. Comparative normalization data for the systems were obtained in the living human subject, based upon comparison of wave forms.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of two corrected vectorcardiographic lead systems with the tetrahedron and cube systems in manAmerican Journal Of Medicine, 1957
- An accurate lead system for spatial vectorcardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1957
- An Accurate, Clinically Practical System For Spatial VectorcardiographyCirculation, 1956
- SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY AND VECTORCARDIOGRAPHYA.M.A. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1955
- A Direct Experimental Study of Three Systems of Spatial VectorcardiographyCirculation, 1954
- Electrocardiographic LeadsCirculation, 1954
- Eccentricity as a cause for the difference between the vectorcardiograms registered by the cube and tetrahedral systemsAmerican Heart Journal, 1953
- Spatial vectorcardiography: Technique for the simultaneous recording of the frontal, sagittal, and horizontal projections. IAmerican Heart Journal, 1951
- HEART-VECTOR AND LEADS.: Part III geometrical representationHeart, 1948