International consensus on preliminary definitions of improvement in adult and juvenile myositis
Open Access
- 6 July 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 50 (7), 2281-2290
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20349
Abstract
Objective To use a core set of outcome measures to develop preliminary definitions of improvement for adult and juvenile myositis as composite end points for therapeutic trials. Methods Twenty‐nine experts in the assessment of myositis achieved consensus on 102 adult and 102 juvenile paper patient profiles as clinically improved or not improved. Two hundred twenty‐seven candidate definitions of improvement were developed using the experts' consensus ratings as a gold standard and their judgment of clinically meaningful change in the core set of measures. Seventeen additional candidate definitions of improvement were developed from classification and regression tree analysis, a data‐mining decision tree tool analysis. Six candidate definitions specifying percentage change or raw change in the core set of measures were developed using logistic regression analysis. Adult and pediatric working groups ranked the 13 top‐performing candidate definitions for face validity, clinical sensibility, and ease of use, in which the sensitivity and specificity were ≥75% in adult, pediatric, and combined data sets. Nominal group technique was used to facilitate consensus formation. Results The definition of improvement (common to the adult and pediatric working groups) that ranked highest was 3 of any 6 of the core set measures improved by ≥20%, with no more than 2 worse by ≥25% (which could not include manual muscle testing to assess strength). Five and 4 additional preliminary definitions of improvement for adult and juvenile myositis, respectively, were also developed, with several definitions common to both groups. Participants also agreed to prospectively test 6 logistic regression definitions of improvement in clinical trials. Conclusion Consensus preliminary definitions of improvement were developed for adult and juvenile myositis, and these incorporate clinically meaningful change in all myositis core set measures in a composite end point. These definitions require prospective validation, but they are now proposed for use as end points in all myositis trials.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Therapeutic strategies for rheumatoid arthritisNature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2003
- An index of the three core data set patient questionnaire measures distinguishes efficacy of active treatment from that of placebo as effectively as the American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria (ACR20) or the Disease Activity Score (DAS) in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trialArthritis & Rheumatism, 2003
- Passing the batonRheumatology, 2003
- Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1997
- Development and validation of the european league against rheumatism response criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison with the preliminary american college of rheumatology and the world health organization/international league against rheumatism criteriaArthritis & Rheumatism, 1996
- American college of rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995
- Measurement of health status in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1994
- The American college of rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trialsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1993
- Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures statistics and strategies for evaluationControlled Clinical Trials, 1991
- Measurement of patient outcome in arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1980