Errors and Artifacts of Doppler Flowmeters and Their Solution
- 1 November 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 112 (11), 1335-1342
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370110069007
Abstract
• Continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound flowmeters are essential instruments for the vascular surgeon. Unfortunately, when used for quantitative purposes, they yield a flow velocity waveform that is substantially in error. Current directional continuous-wave Doppler velocimeters use a 0-crossing detector to convert the Doppler signal to a waveform. Unfortunately, there are several inherent problems with this technique, and velocity waveforms are produced that have significant artifacts or errors. In this report, it is shown that a multifilter system is a simple, inexpensive alternative to systems using a 0-crossing detector, and furthermore, permits real-time display of the Doppler waveform. The severity of the underlying arterial disease can be quantified by the calculation of pulsatility index. The pulsatility index was calculated from the Doppler waveforms recorded from peripheral arteries in 155 limbs and showed an excellent correlation with the severity of atherosclerosis as assessed by arteriography. (Arch Surg 112:1335-1342, 1977)Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of the role of pulsatility index in quantitation of the severity of peripheral arterial occlusive diseaseThe American Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Accuracy and limitations of the ultrasonic Doppler blood velocimeter and zero crossing detectorJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1975
- Pitfalls Using Doppler Ultrasound to Transduce Blood FlowIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1973
- A new non-invasive technique for assessment of superficial femoral artery obstructionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1972