Preventing Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection in the United States: A National Study
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 15 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 46 (2), 243-250
- https://doi.org/10.1086/524662
Abstract
Background. Although urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common hospital-acquired infection in the United States, to our knowledge, no national data exist describing what hospitals in the United States are doing to prevent this patient safety problem. We conducted a national study to examine the current practices used by hospitals to prevent hospital-acquired UTI. Methods. We mailed written surveys to infection control coordinators at a national random sample of nonfederal US hospitals with an intensive care unit and ⩾50 hospital beds (n=600) and to all Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals (n=119). The survey asked about practices to prevent hospital-acquired UTI and other device-associated infections. Results. The response rate was 72%. Overall, 56% of hospitals did not have a system for monitoring which patients had urinary catheters placed, and 74% did not monitor catheter duration. Thirty percent of hospitals reported regularly using antimicrobial urinary catheters and portable bladder scanners; 14% used condom catheters, and 9% used catheter reminders. VA hospitals were more likely than non-VA hospitals to use portable bladder scanners (49% vs. 29%; P<.001), condom catheters (46% vs. 12%; P<.001), and suprapubic catheters (22% vs. 9%; P<.001); non-VA hospitals were more likely to use antimicrobial urinary catheters (30% vs. 14%; P=.002). Conclusions. Despite the strong link between urinary catheters and subsequent UTI, we found no strategy that appeared to be widely used to prevent hospital-acquired UTI. The most commonly used practices—bladder ultrasound and antimicrobial catheters—were each used in fewer than one-third of hospitals, and urinary catheter reminders, which have proven benefits, were used in <10% of US hospitals.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Infection Control — A Problem for Patient SafetyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Indwelling Urinary Catheters: A One-Point Restraint?Annals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Bone Mass Response to Discontinuation of Long-term Hormone Replacement TherapyResults From the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Safety Follow-up StudyArchives of Internal Medicine, 2002
- The Direct Costs of Nosocomial Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in the Era of Managed CareInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2002
- Urinary Incontinence Treatment Preferences in Long‐Term CareJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2001
- Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters?The American Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuriaAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2000
- Urinary Catheters: What Type Do Men and Their Nurses Prefer?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1999
- THE NATIONWIDE NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION RATEAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals, 1975–1976American Journal Of Medicine, 1981